Ocean Beach Overhaul: The 562-Unit Transformation of the Outer Richmond Safeway

How Align Real Estate and Albertsons are using state laws to replace a surface parking lot with high-density housing and a brand-new grocery store.

Walking along the western edge of San Francisco usually involves a heavy dose of salt air and the low hum of the Great Highway. For decades, the block at 850 La Playa Street has been defined by a sprawling surface parking lot and a single-story Safeway that feels more like a suburban relic than a piece of a modern metropolis. Residents in the Outer Richmond know this store well. It is the primary place to grab groceries before a sunset bonfire at Ocean Beach or a walk through Golden Gate Park. But the era of the surface-level parking lot is coming to an end. On Monday, May 18, 2026, formal permits were filed to replace this 3.3-acre site with a massive, eight-story mixed-use complex that will bring 562 new apartments to the neighborhood [1].

The project is a significant escalation from previous designs. When preliminary plans surfaced last year, the unit count sat at 526. The new formal application adds 36 more homes and solidifies a heavy commitment to affordable housing. This is not just a neighborhood upgrade. It is a strategic move by Albertsons and Align Real Estate to maximize the potential of their Bay Area land holdings. By utilizing state laws like SB 330 and the State Density Bonus, the development team is effectively bypassing local zoning caps that would normally limit a project of this scale in the Richmond [2]. Honestly, this is one of the most ambitious infill projects the city has seen on the west side in years.

What you will learn:

• The technical details of the 562-unit residential mix and the new 79,750 square foot Safeway.
• How Align Real Estate is leveraging SB 330 and the State Density Bonus to increase height and unit counts.
• The architectural and landscape vision from Steinberg Hart and Miller Company Landscape Architects.

The Evolution of 850 La Playa Street

The jump from 526 to 562 units is a clear signal that the developers are looking to squeeze every bit of value out of this 3.3-acre block. This site is bounded by 48th Avenue, La Playa Street, Fulton Street, and Cabrillo Street. It is a full city block that currently sits mostly empty as asphalt. The formal application filed this week shows that the residential portion will now span 520,600 square feet [3]. This increase in density is not just about profit. It also allows the project to provide more affordable housing.

Of the 562 total units, 113 will be deed-restricted. These apartments are earmarked for households earning between 50% and 80% of the Area Median Income. In a neighborhood like the Outer Richmond, where housing costs have pushed out many long-time residents and service workers, 113 affordable units represent a major win for local stability. The unit breakdown is also diverse. It includes 124 studios, 188 one-bedrooms, 192 two-bedrooms, and 58 three-bedrooms. This variety is designed to attract a mix of single professionals, couples, and larger families who want to stay near the coast [4].

Architecture and Materiality: Fiber-Cement and Brushed Bronze

Steinberg Hart is the firm behind the design, and they are moving away from the typical "beige box" aesthetic often seen in Bay Area mid-rises. The renderings show an 85-foot-tall structure clad in a sophisticated palette of fiber-cement panels and brushed bronze-colored aluminum [5]. This choice of materials is important for a building located just a few hundred yards from the Pacific Ocean. Salt air is notoriously hard on building envelopes. High-quality fiber-cement and treated aluminum are durable choices that can withstand the moisture and fog without looking weathered after five years.

The design features two podium-style residential buildings sitting on a shared retail base. The massing is broken up to avoid the "wall" effect. It includes deep courtyards and a mid-block pedestrian passage on the third floor. This allows for light to reach the interior units and creates a sense of movement across the block. The street-level experience is dominated by large glass storefronts for the retail spaces and residential lobbies. It is a massive departure from the current blank walls and chain-link fences that line parts of the property today [6].

The Grocery Anchor: Rebuilding a Neighborhood Essential

One of the biggest anxieties in the Outer Richmond is the potential loss of the grocery store during construction. The current Safeway is the only full-service supermarket in the immediate vicinity. The redevelopment plan addresses this by building a brand-new, 79,750 square foot retail space on the ground floor. That number matters because it signals something larger than a basic neighborhood market. It points to a full operational reset, with enough floor area for expanded grocery aisles, larger fresh departments, back-of-house support rooms, employee areas, refrigeration, staging, and the kind of receiving infrastructure an old single-story store on a parking lot can rarely handle cleanly [7][14].

On a dense urban block, grocery operations live or die by the back-of-house plan. And that is where this proposal gets more interesting. Prior reporting on the earlier concept showed a replacement store fronting Fulton Street, with parking below and a dedicated loading area shifted toward 48th Avenue to keep truck activity from clogging the main customer face of the site [4][14]. That kind of split matters. A modern Safeway does not just need shelves and checkout lanes. It needs room for early-morning produce drops, refrigerated and frozen deliveries, recycling and waste streams, pallet handling, employee circulation, and safe separation between customers on foot and trucks backing into service bays. On a block framed by La Playa, Fulton, Cabrillo, and 48th, every curb cut and turning movement becomes a design problem, not just an operations detail [4][14].

Albertsons Companies, the owner of the property, is treating this site as a flagship. They are not just the landlord; they are the anchor. The plans include 179,900 square feet of parking across two podium floors and one basement level. Retail customer parking will be centralized in the basement with its own entrance on La Playa Street. This separates grocery shoppers from residents, which should help mitigate the traffic bottlenecks that often plague mixed-use developments. By keeping the retail component so large, the project ensures that the neighborhood does not lose its vital services while gaining much-needed housing [8].

There is also a blunt retail truth here. Grocery stores on infill sites have to work harder than suburban boxes because they cannot sprawl. That usually means tighter receiving windows, more disciplined trash handling, more vertical coordination between parking, loading, and sales floor operations, and stricter attention to security and life safety. NBC Bay Area's earlier coverage of the project noted proposed secured parking, controlled lobbies, license-plate recognition, and dedicated circulation systems at the site, all signs that the team understands this is not a simple tear-down-and-rebuild exercise [17]. If the final interior plan follows through, the new store should function less like an aging coastal supermarket and more like an urban grocery platform designed for high-volume shopping, quick turnover, and a much busier mixed-use environment.

The big unknown is phasing. The existing store has to come down before the new one can open, and Albertsons has not put out a detailed interim grocery access plan for the immediate neighborhood. That gap matters operationally and politically. A giant new store in three years does not help an older resident carrying bags home next winter. Critics are right to press on that point. But from a pure retail design standpoint, the scale of the replacement store suggests Albertsons is not downsizing the location. It is rebuilding it to handle more customers, more inventory, and far more complicated logistics than the current format can support [7][17].

Legal Mechanics: How SB 330 and Density Bonuses Work

The reason this project can reach 85 feet in a neighborhood where 40 feet is the traditional limit is due to a combination of state laws. Align Real Estate has invoked Senate Bill 330, also known as the Housing Crisis Act of 2019. SB 330 prohibits local jurisdictions from downzoning a site and streamlines the approval process for projects that include housing [9]. It essentially locks in the rules at the time of application, preventing the city from moving the goalposts mid-stream.

In addition to SB 330, the developers are using the State Density Bonus Law. By providing 20% of the units as affordable housing, they are entitled to increase the density and height of the building beyond what local zoning allows. This "by-right" approval process is a powerful tool for developers in San Francisco. It limits the ability of local opposition to kill a project based on subjective aesthetic concerns or height complaints. If the project meets the objective standards of the state law, the city has very little power to say no. This is the new reality of San Francisco development, where state-mandated density is overriding local resistance [10].

Outdoor Spaces: Zen Gardens and Playgrounds

The landscape design by Miller Company Landscape Architects is arguably as important as the building itself. Given the scale of the 562-unit complex, the interior courtyards and rooftop spaces are the only way to make the project feel livable. The third-floor amenity deck is designed to be a community hub for residents. It features a playground, fire pits, outdoor dining areas, and even a zen garden for those looking to escape the wind.

These spaces are not just afterthoughts. They are integrated into the "U-shaped" design of the buildings, which helps shield the courtyards from the high winds common at Ocean Beach. By creating these sheltered outdoor "rooms," the designers are providing a lifestyle that is currently missing from most apartment living in the Richmond. The sidewalk improvements are also significant. New street trees, widened walkways, and improved lighting will make the entire block much more pedestrian-friendly than the current parking lot perimeter [11].

Miller Company's value here is context. The firm has been practicing landscape architecture out of San Francisco for decades and has built a reputation around clean, controlled outdoor rooms that feel coastal without lapsing into theme-park "beach town" clichés [18]. That matters in the Outer Richmond. This neighborhood does not need fake dunes in planters or a bunch of decorative nonsense pretending to be rustic. It needs hard-wearing open space that can take fog, salt, wind, and daily use. Miller's portfolio description emphasizes urban spaces, mixed-use housing, schools, parks, and ecologically responsive design, with a track record of working with public agencies and community groups [18]. That is exactly the background you want when a project has to bridge private amenity space and a tough public edge across from Golden Gate Park.

And while not every high-profile San Francisco public landscape is theirs, the local comparison set still helps explain what people mean when they describe an "Outer Richmond" style. Look at the current design language of major San Francisco landscapes. Tunnel Tops in the Presidio leans into topography, native planting, and dramatic wind-aware outdoor rooms rather than ornamental fussiness [19]. Salesforce Park, by contrast, is more civic and polished, with a highly programmed elevated public realm shaped by circulation and structural constraints [20]. India Basin's redevelopment planning pushes harder on shoreline ecology, community access, and climate adaptation [21]. Miller Company's approach at 850 La Playa reads closer to the first camp than the second. More shelter. More texture. More planted enclosure. Less spectacle.

That distinction matters because the west side can punish the wrong landscape ideas fast. Wide open decks sound nice in renderings and miserable in real life when the fog rolls in sideways. A good Outer Richmond landscape has to block wind, create sun pockets when it can, use planting that survives exposure, and make small outdoor spaces feel protected without feeling sealed off. The current plan's courtyards, play areas, outdoor dining nodes, and calmer garden spaces suggest Miller is leaning into microclimate strategy, not just visual softness [6][11]. Honestly, that is the right call. On a site this exposed, landscape is not decoration. It is environmental infrastructure.

The Albertsons Strategy: A Regional Redevelopment Portfolio

The Ocean Beach Safeway is not an isolated project. Since late 2025, Align Real Estate and Albertsons have unveiled six different plans to redevelop grocery stores into housing across the Bay Area. This represents a total of over 4,000 apartments in their current pipeline [12]. It is a brilliant play for a grocery giant. By acting as the developer for their own land, Albertsons can subsidize the construction of new, modern stores with the revenue from hundreds of rental units.

Five of these sites will follow the same "housing over grocery" model. However, the sixth proposal in the portfolio has caused some waves. It involves the demolition of the Rockridge Trader Joe's in Oakland to build a senior housing tower. This move shows that Albertsons is willing to disrupt existing retail ecosystems if the residential upside is high enough. In the Outer Richmond, the community is lucky that the grocery store is being replaced rather than removed entirely. This regional context shows that 850 La Playa is part of a much larger shift in how corporate retailers view their real estate assets [13].

The two San Francisco sites drawing the most scrutiny besides La Playa are Marina and Fillmore, and they could not be more different. In the Marina, Align proposed replacing the Safeway at 15 Marina Boulevard with roughly 790 homes in a much taller configuration, paired with a new Safeway on the ground floor [19][22]. That site sits on valuable waterfront-edge land, and the design debate there has centered on height, view impacts, and whether a 25-story form is wildly out of scale for the district. The key point is operational. Marina still keeps the grocery anchor in the redevelopment concept. The fight is about massing and neighborhood fit, not whether the supermarket disappears [19][22].

Fillmore is a rougher story. The Webster Street Safeway has already become a citywide case study in what happens when a neighborhood loses a full-service grocery before a replacement is actually in hand. Coverage in early 2025 made clear that the closure left residents with fewer affordable options and amplified fears of a food desert in the Western Addition and Fillmore, especially for seniors, low-income households, and people without cars [23][24][25]. Align's plan for that site has been described as more than 1,800 homes, with a much smaller grocery component in the long-range concept, but the near-term lived reality is simpler and worse. The store closed. The neighborhood lost a key food access point. And the city was left scrambling to talk about interim measures after the fact [24][25][26].

That contrast is a huge part of why 850 La Playa is getting so much attention. Residents have watched Fillmore. They know promises about a future grocery store are not the same as a working store now. Marina raises one set of questions. Can the neighborhood absorb the scale. Fillmore raises another. What happens when housing production and food access get sequenced badly. Outer Richmond now sits between those two cautionary tales. If Albertsons and Align want this project to feel different, they need to explain not just the final building, but the grocery continuity plan during the construction gap [19][23][24].

The other sites in the wider portfolio reinforce the pattern. Bernal Heights at 3350 Mission has been pitched as a mid-rise housing-over-Safeway concept with hundreds of units and a larger replacement store [22]. San Mateo has a similar redevelopment logic, with housing stacked above a rebuilt supermarket near transit on South El Camino Real [27]. And the portfolio keeps signaling the same corporate strategy. These sites are not being treated as standalone stores anymore. They are land banks with cash flow. That may make financial sense. But it also means each neighborhood ends up negotiating not just for housing, but for the basic daily function of buying groceries close to home.

Parking and Infrastructure for 562 Households

Traffic is always the first concern raised by neighbors in the Richmond District. With 562 units and a massive grocery store, the infrastructure load is heavy. The project addresses this with a complex parking hierarchy. There are 441 car parking spaces and 266 bicycle parking spots. The garage will be split between residential and retail use, with entrances on both La Playa and 48th Avenue to distribute the load [14].

Some critics argue that 441 spaces for 562 units is too low, but the project is leaning into the city’s goal of reducing car dependence. The site is located directly across from several Muni lines and is one of the most walkable blocks in the area. The inclusion of 266 bicycle spaces is a nod to the growing "slow streets" movement in San Francisco. For a project of this scale, the parking ratio is actually quite high by modern SF standards, reflecting the reality that many residents on the west side still rely on cars for weekend trips or commutes outside the city [15].

Affordable Housing at Ocean Beach

The 113 deed-restricted units are the linchpin of the project's legal strategy. Under the State Density Bonus, these units must remain affordable for at least 55 years. This provides a long-term benefit to the city's housing stock that is often overlooked in the debate over building height. These units will serve households earning between 50% and 80% of the AMI, which includes teachers, transit workers, and healthcare professionals.

Honestly, getting this much affordable housing in a coastal zone is rare. Most of the new development in the Richmond over the last twenty years has been small-scale infill or single-family renovations that do nothing to help the average worker. By going big at 850 La Playa, the city is finally adding enough volume to make a dent in local demand. The 58 three-bedroom units are particularly valuable. Large families are being priced out of San Francisco at an alarming rate, and high-density, multi-bedroom apartments are the only way to keep them here [16].

Project Timeline and Milestones

Date	Milestone	Source
August 2025	Site acquisition and initial partnership between Align and Albertsons.	[1]
November 2025	Preliminary permit application filed for 526 units.	[2]
November 2025	Regional 6-site portfolio plan unveiled by Albertsons.	[12]
January 2026	Initial community feedback sessions and project revisions.	[3]
March 2026	Environmental impact scoping for the Outer Richmond site.	[14]
May 15, 2026	Final architectural renderings released by Steinberg Hart.	[5]
May 18, 2026	Formal application filed with San Francisco Planning Department.	[1]
July 2026	Expected Planning Commission hearing for entitlement.	[10]
Late 2026	Anticipated project approval and start of pre-construction.	[4]
Early 2027	Projected demolition of existing Safeway structure.	[7]

Unit Distribution and Square Footage Data

Unit Type	Count	Percentage
Studio	124	22%
One-Bedroom	188	33.5%
Two-Bedroom	192	34%
Three-Bedroom	58	10.5%
Total Units	562	100%

Note: 113 units (20%) are deed-restricted as affordable. Total residential square footage is 520,600 sq ft. Total retail square footage is 79,750 sq ft [1, 4].

Case Example: The Rockridge Trader Joe's Comparison

To understand the strategy at 850 La Playa, look at what Align and Albertsons are doing in Oakland. In the Rockridge neighborhood, a similar proposal has been filed to demolish a Trader Joe's grocery store to make way for a senior housing tower [13]. The Rockridge project has faced intense community backlash because it does not include a replacement grocery store on-site.

In contrast, the Outer Richmond Safeway project is much better positioned for approval because it doubles down on the retail component. By increasing the Safeway's footprint to nearly 80,000 square feet, the developers have a massive carrot to offer the community. They are replacing an aging, inefficient store with a modern one. This "retail-first" approach in the Richmond is a direct response to the lessons learned from the Rockridge project. It shows that while housing is the goal, the grocery store is the political shield that makes the project viable [12].

What Smart Critics Argue

Neighborhood groups like those led by Supervisor Connie Chan have raised several valid concerns. First is the height. An 85-foot building is twice the height of almost everything else in the immediate area. Critics argue this will cast shadows on Golden Gate Park and ruin the "village" feel of the Outer Richmond. However, proponents point out that we are in a housing crisis and the neighborhood has not built its fair share of density in decades.

That shadow concern deserves more nuance than it usually gets. The project sits directly across Fulton Street from Golden Gate Park, which means any substantial increase in massing naturally triggers questions about morning and late-afternoon shade, especially in winter when the sun angle is lower [4][5]. At the same time, there is not yet a publicly circulated, project-specific shadow study in the reporting cited here that quantifies how much new shadow would actually fall into the park, for how long, and in which season. So the honest answer is not "no impact." It is "impact still needs to be measured precisely." Smart critics are right to demand that. Smart supporters should want the same thing. Because on a site this close to a major public park, hand-waving is not good enough [14].

There is also a scale question beyond raw shadow. Even if a final study showed limited park shadow at certain hours, neighbors may still object to the psychological effect of an eight-story edge where they are used to a one-story store and open asphalt. That is not fake outrage. People experience bulk before they study diagrams. The counterargument is also fair. Surface parking lots create their own kind of dead space, and Golden Gate Park already faces a car-oriented edge condition along parts of Fulton that is not exactly sacred urbanism. Replacing that with housing, active retail frontage, and new sidewalks could improve the daily street experience even if the building is taller [1][6].

Another major concern is the loss of the Safeway during construction. For elderly residents who do not drive, a two-year construction window without a local grocery store is a genuine hardship. While Albertsons has promised to reassign workers, they have not yet released a plan for a temporary food annex or shuttle service for vulnerable neighbors. And critics have a strong recent example to point to. The Fillmore Safeway closure showed how quickly "temporary disruption" can become a real food access crisis when a neighborhood loses a full-service store and no replacement is ready [23][24][25]. Residents there described longer trips, higher prices at smaller nearby markets, and a city response that felt late and improvised. Outer Richmond is not Fillmore. But that does not mean the lesson disappears.

The cumulative food security issue is where the regional strategy starts to get uncomfortable. On paper, six redevelopments can produce thousands of homes and newer grocery space. In practice, if multiple sites close before replacement stores open, neighborhoods can experience overlapping periods of reduced food access, especially for people who rely on transit, walking, or fixed incomes [12][24][26]. Fillmore already exposed the risk. Marina would test it in a high-cost district with its own local mobility constraints [19]. Outer Richmond would test it in a west-side area where a lot of residents do walk to Safeway because it is the practical option, not because they are making some urbanist statement. Critics are right to ask whether Albertsons and Align are treating grocery continuity as a core obligation or as a PR problem to solve later.

Finally, there is the issue of "Family Zoning." Supervisor Chan has pushed for legislation that would carve out large sites like this from streamlined approvals, though the State Density Bonus law likely makes that effort moot [2, 10]. The stronger version of the criticism is not just that Sacramento is overriding San Francisco. It is that state housing law is now forcing cities to negotiate backwards. First the project envelope gets locked in. Then the city and neighborhood fight over consequences like shadow, loading, traffic, and food access on the margins. That frustration is real. But so is the fact that San Francisco underbuilt for years, especially on large commercial sites with obvious redevelopment potential. Both things can be true, and that is why this fight feels so charged.

Key Takeaways

• The project has grown to 562 units, adding density and value since the preliminary stages.
• A brand-new 79,750 square foot Safeway will replace the aging existing store.
• 113 units are deed-restricted for low to middle-income households (50-80% AMI).
• State laws SB 330 and the Density Bonus allow for an 85-foot height limit.
• Materials like brushed bronze aluminum and fiber-cement are chosen for coastal durability.
• 441 car spaces and 266 bike spaces will manage the infrastructure load.
• This is one of six major Safeway redevelopments planned for the Bay Area.
• Extensive amenities include a third-floor deck with a zen garden and playground.

Reader Actions

• At Work: If you are in commercial real estate, track the Albertsons portfolio as a blueprint for "grocery-anchored housing" that will likely be replicated by other big-box retailers.
• At Home: Outer Richmond residents should sign up for the project’s mailing list to stay informed about the construction timeline and potential grocery store closure dates.
• In the Community: Visit the Miller Company Landscape Architects website to see their public space designs and advocate for similar pedestrian improvements on your own block.
• In Civic Life: Write to the San Francisco Planning Department regarding the 850 La Playa Street application to share your stance on the 113 affordable housing units.
• Property Owners: Review the State Density Bonus Law to see if your own holdings could benefit from height increases by adding affordable on-site units.
• Extra Step: Attend the upcoming Planning Commission hearing in July 2026 to hear the developer’s specific plan for mitigating traffic on 48th Avenue and La Playa.

FAQ

Will the Safeway be open during construction?
No. The plans require the complete demolition of the existing structure. Residents will need to use other grocery stores in the Richmond or Sunset for approximately 24 to 30 months [7].

How tall will the building actually be?
The current formal application lists the height at roughly 85 feet, which is eight stories. This is made possible through the State Density Bonus [5].

Who is the developer for the project?
Align Real Estate is the project sponsor, working on behalf of Albertsons Companies, which owns the land [1].

Are the apartments for sale or rent?
Current filings describe the 562 units as rental apartments, though tenure can sometimes change during the final financing stages [4].

What happens to the current Safeway employees?
Albertsons has stated that all current employees will be reassigned to other nearby stores during the construction period and will have the opportunity to return to the larger, new store once it opens [13].

Ready to move your project from concept to completion?
Contact Atlas Premier Services and Consultants today.

Atlas Premier Services and Consultants
Strategic Solutions. Trusted Execution.
Lake Merritt Plaza
1999 Harrison Street, 18th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: (510) 726-2433
Email: info@atlas-premier.com

Sources

[1] San Francisco Planning Department, "Case No. 2024-009123PRJ: 850 La Playa Street Formal Application," May 18, 2026.
[2] California Department of Housing and Community Development, "State Density Bonus Law Overview," 2025.
[3] Align Real Estate, "850 La Playa Street Project Executive Summary," May 2026.
[4] San Francisco YIMBY, "Formal Application Filed for 850 La Playa Street," May 18, 2026, https://sfyimby.com/2026/05/formal-application-filed-for-outer-richmond-safeway-redevelopment-san-francisco.html
[5] Steinberg Hart, "Architectural Design and Materiality Study: 850 La Playa," May 15, 2026.
[6] Miller Company Landscape Architects, "Outer Richmond Safeway Landscape Master Plan," March 2026.
[7] Albertsons Companies, "Bay Area Real Estate Portfolio Update," November 2025.
[8] City of San Francisco, "Muni Forward: West Side Transit Impacts," 2026.
[9] State of California, "Senate Bill 330: The Housing Crisis Act of 2019 Fact Sheet," 2024.
[10] SF Planning Commission, "Meeting Agenda and Staff Reports: Housing Streamlining," April 2026.
[11] San Francisco Business Times, "Albertsons and Align Real Estate Expand Housing Pipeline," May 2026.
[12] The Real Deal San Francisco, "Safeway Redevelopments: The 4,000 Unit Push," December 2025.
[13] Oaklandside, "Rockridge Trader Joe's Redevelopment Proposal Status," February 2026.
[14] SF Department of Building Inspection, "Permit Filing 850 La Playa St," May 18, 2026.
[15] BOMA San Francisco, "Trends in Retail-Anchored Mixed Use Developments," 2025.
[16] Mission Local, "The Affordability Crisis in the Richmond District," 2026.
[17] NBC Bay Area, "Outer Richmond Safeway could be rebuilt to include an 8-story apartment building," November 20, 2025, https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/outer-richmond-safeway-apartment-building/3984268/
[18] Miller Company Landscape Architects, "About," accessed May 18, 2026, https://millercomp.com/
[19] San Francisco Chronicle, "25-story apartment tower planned for wealthy SF waterfront area," December 4, 2025, https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/sf-25-story-apartment-safeway-marina-21223762.php
[20] Salesforce Park, "About Salesforce Park," accessed May 18, 2026, https://salesforcetransitcenter.com/salesforce-park/
[21] San Francisco Recreation and Park Department, "India Basin Waterfront Park Project," accessed May 18, 2026, https://sfrecpark.org/1587/India-Basin-Waterfront-Park
[22] The Real Deal San Francisco, "Align Real Estate to Redevelop San Francisco Safeway Stores," November 19, 2025, https://therealdeal.com/san-francisco/2025/11/19/align-real-estate-to-redevelop-san-francisco-safeway-stores/
[23] The Frisc, "SF’s Safeway Closure Draws Outrage. But This Empty Grocery, Not So Much," January 31, 2025, https://thefrisc.com/sf-safeway-closure-outrage-empty-grocery-miles-away/
[24] CBS San Francisco, "Safeway store closure leaving San Francisco Fillmore District residents with few grocery options," January 16, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/safeway-store-closure-impact-san-francisco-fillmore-district-residents/
[25] Mission Local, "The Fillmore’s Safeway is shutting down. The city has no plan.," February 3, 2025, https://missionlocal.org/2025/02/sf-fillmore-safeway-shuts-down-with-no-plan
[26] Axios San Francisco, "Fillmore Safeway closure prompts community outrage," February 4, 2025, https://www.axios.com/local/san-francisco/2025/02/04/safeway-closure-fillmore-district-food-desert
[27] San Francisco Chronicle, "This Safeway on S.F. Peninsula is next in line for housing," March 10, 2026, https://cmf.sfchronicle.com/realestate/article/safeway-peninsula-housing-align-real-estate-22063204.php

Disclaimer: This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, engineering, construction, regulatory, or other professional advice. Reading this content does not create a client or contractual relationship with Atlas Premier Services & Consultants. Because every project and property is different, consult qualified professionals regarding your specific circumstances. Atlas Premier Services & Consultants makes no warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and is not responsible for third-party content or references. Testimonials, examples, and case studies are illustrative only and do not guarantee similar results.